Difference between revisions of "Talk:SP Government: Building Department"

From The SchomEmunity Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New design)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
I do agree with Mars.  I appreciate people worked hard on it (and personally I like the new look but even if I didn't....) --[[User:Julia G|Julia G]] 21:38, 12 August 2007 (BST)
 
I do agree with Mars.  I appreciate people worked hard on it (and personally I like the new look but even if I didn't....) --[[User:Julia G|Julia G]] 21:38, 12 August 2007 (BST)
 +
 +
:It's an ugly shade of blue, features arbitrary use of colour, has spelling errors, is less legible, messes up the wiki's consistency, is inconsistent within the page itself, and manages to completely evade the only bit that actually needed to be reformatted (the regulations, which should probably be sub-sub headings under a single sub heading) - [[User:Katharine Berry|Katharine Schomer]] 00:31, 13 August 2007 (BST)

Revision as of 18:31, 12 August 2007

New design

It's horrible and illegible. Please change it back.

Katharine - I prefer constructive critiscism - how can we improve it, not "I hate it" --Marsbar9 Schomer 19:24, 12 August 2007 (BST)

I do agree with Mars. I appreciate people worked hard on it (and personally I like the new look but even if I didn't....) --Julia G 21:38, 12 August 2007 (BST)

It's an ugly shade of blue, features arbitrary use of colour, has spelling errors, is less legible, messes up the wiki's consistency, is inconsistent within the page itself, and manages to completely evade the only bit that actually needed to be reformatted (the regulations, which should probably be sub-sub headings under a single sub heading) - Katharine Schomer 00:31, 13 August 2007 (BST)