The assessment of academics

From The Schommunity Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

In higher education academics are assessed, for example as part of the promotion process. Two academics from different disciplines (eg education and physics) might be applying for internal promotion (in a context where there are a limited number of people who can be promoted that year). The promotion panel would make decisions about which of these two people to promote based on evidence about their performance - which would often take the form of a CV plus some references (and possibly a couple of sides of A4 on which the case was made for why this particular person deserved promotion).

This process relies almost entirely on peer review - the status of an academic depends upon:

The entire process relies upon the judgements (assessments) of peers, who are trusted to be able to evaluate the quality of a colleague working in the same field.

This process is then used to enable comparisons to be made between academics in very different fields (who one might think of as having followed very different curricula).

Wikied wanted to see if a similar approach could be used in other contexts (eg with young people).

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
schome website
Virtual worlds
Useful stuff
Toolbox