The schome community Go to the Schome Wiki
August 04, 2020, 11:49:39 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: To register for the wiki or forum email ONE sentence explaining why you want to join the Schommunity to Peter[dot]Twining[at]newcastle[dot]edu[dot]au
(Replace [dot] with . and [at] with @)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: When was the wiki set up?  (Read 7194 times)
Gaea Sparker
Sr. Member
****


Posts: 419


View Profile Email
« on: April 04, 2008, 03:49:15 PM »

I'm trying to get some wiki stats to put in the proposal. but this page http://schome.open.ac.uk/wikiworks/index.php/Special:Statistics
isn't that useful....

i want to know how many pages viewed per day.....is the information out there anywhere. 
Logged
Fox Phlox
Hero Member
*****


Posts: 3228



View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2008, 04:02:25 PM »

Oldest pages
http://schome.open.ac.uk/wikiworks/index.php/Special:Ancientpages

This suggests that the first page was set up by Jonty on 25 April 2005
Nothing else happened until PeterT set up a page in April 2006, and Elliot set one up in May, and then nothing happened until April 2007.

This seems very inaccurate to me; we had loads of stuff in place by April 2007. However, it seems fairly clear that the wiki first opened for business in April 2005 - probably on 19 April, when the first amendments to the Main page were made.
Logged

Only the stoutest arm, the bravest heart, with a magic charm and a good head start can ever outfox the Fox
Gaea Sparker
Sr. Member
****


Posts: 419


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2008, 04:08:04 PM »

I need to find a way of getting the average number of wiki page views a day.....

Surely this is a useful statistic to display on the stats page?!
Logged
Achilles Schomer
The Hawaiian Shirts
Hero Member
***


Posts: 1687



View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2008, 05:13:19 PM »

That list must be inaccurate

Mainly becuase the skybase@250 page surely did not precede the joining instructions for us on the pilot...
Logged

My posts are like buses...you wait days for a reply then they all come at once!
Achilles Schomer
The Hawaiian Shirts
Hero Member
***


Posts: 1687



View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2008, 05:15:48 PM »

that list is inaccurate
skybase was 6th while the instructions just to get in is 286th

I think its the last modified dates
Logged

My posts are like buses...you wait days for a reply then they all come at once!
Marsbar9 Schomer
Coordinator
Hero Member
****


Posts: 3588


:-)


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2008, 06:23:19 PM »

I've looked at this before, and thought the logical way to think about it is to find when the main page was first created by WikiWorks.
Logged

-Mars
PeterT
Administrator
Hero Member
*


Posts: 3891



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: April 05, 2008, 04:34:56 PM »

Check out the Schome Community History - which records it as starting in May 2005 ... though actually it was the 19th April 2005 ...
Logged
An¡mus
SP Global Moderator
Hero Member
****


Posts: 3410


Original Schomer


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2008, 07:26:06 PM »


Are you going to miss schome?
Logged
PeterT
Administrator
Hero Member
*


Posts: 3891



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #8 on: April 06, 2008, 09:30:29 AM »


Are you going to miss schome?

Schome does not yet exist - so am assuming you are meaning 'are you going to miss Schome Park?'

I expect Schome Park will return at some point in the future (post closure at end of May) - but we do need to refocus on why Schome Park was created in the first place - and we do need to reflect on what we have learnt so far ...

Logged
An¡mus
SP Global Moderator
Hero Member
****


Posts: 3410


Original Schomer


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #9 on: April 07, 2008, 04:05:15 PM »


If schome doesn't exist, then why does it have a website? (refference to "The Schome website"..)
Logged
Marsbar9 Schomer
Coordinator
Hero Member
****


Posts: 3588


:-)


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #10 on: April 07, 2008, 04:08:41 PM »

Ooh - interesting :P

Could it be that schome has two meanings?

1) Schome being an education system, in which case it's in progress
2) Schome being the organisation / group working towards number 1

:P
Logged

-Mars
Alice SParker
Full Member
***


Posts: 208


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: April 07, 2008, 04:55:01 PM »

Ooh - interesting :P

Could it be that schome has two meanings?

1) Schome being an education system, in which case it's in progress
2) Schome being the organisation / group working towards number 1

:P
himm.. I would understand it rather as 1 above.. in progress & possibilities being tested out..


If schome doesn't exist, then why does it have a website? (refference to "The Schome website"..)

Why do you feel it doesn't make sense to have a website for something that does not exist, yet?
Logged
An¡mus
SP Global Moderator
Hero Member
****


Posts: 3410


Original Schomer


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #12 on: April 07, 2008, 05:23:59 PM »


Because as my tab rightly tells me it is 'The Schome website' implying that the information on that website is about Schome and not global warming.
Making a website for something that does not exist yet is forward planning for when it does exist unless it is a pun or fictional, whereas this does exist as it has a home page, a news page, a projects page, a publications page, an investors page, a contact page, a site map, an actively used forum and a wiki that has had almost 2.5 million page views. Furthermore if it did not exist there would be no projects, news, publications or investors so there would be no need for those pages unless it is all an incredibly misleeding website giving false information and facts in which case I should have you sued ::)
Logged
Alice SParker
Full Member
***


Posts: 208


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: April 07, 2008, 08:54:07 PM »

Himm, nice thoughts there!
Well, I see the Schome website like a website for a car (let's say a car that runs on water), which is just at the design phase - even at the idea phase! The bits / tryouts, that are on the website, are not the car itself, but would hopefully lead to the development of the car.
If it is clearly stated on the webpage that this is not the car, but a way of testing for the development the car, would you still sue the designers?  ::)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!